Actions that constitute misconduct (e.g. after the match, social media posts, actions of a coach), may be reported by the referee, other coach/players, or other interested party and such actions will be investigated following World Rugby Regulation 18.
All teams, players and coaches must cooperate with the investigation of the Designated Disciplinary Officer appointed to investigate misconduct. Pursuant to Regulation 18.7.1, “failure to cooperate with such investigation may itself constitute Misconduct under Regulation 18”.
The above is being provided to summarize World Rugby Regulations 17, 18 and 20 and the NERFU proceedings and likely relevant timelines. However, the procedures outlined in Regulations 17, 18 and 20, or any decision of a Disciplinary Committee, Judicial Officer, Appeal Committee or Appeal Officer shall not be quashed or held invalid by reason of any defect, irregularity, omission or other technicality unless such defect, irregularity, omission or technicality raises a material doubt as to the reliability of the findings or decisions of a Disciplinary Committee, Judicial Officer, Appeal Committee or Appeal Officer or results in a miscarriage of justice. (17.28.2). For example, if the referee is late to file a report or the information is not processed within certain timelines, this is not grounds for dismissal or appeal.
